Table of Links
-
Discussion and Broader Impact, Acknowledgements, and References
D. Differences with Glaze Finetuning
H. Existing Style Mimicry Protections
E Findings on Glaze 2.0
After concluding our user study, Glaze (Shan et al., 2023a) released an updated version of their tool (v2.0). According to the official release, “This new version significantly improved Glaze robustness against the newest AI models”. Although we could not run the entire user study with the latest protections, we reproduced some of our experiments to verify if protections were more robust under robust mimicry. We believe this comparison is fair to Glaze since we are using newer models—such as Stable Diffusion XL for upscaling. These models, although released before Glaze 1.1.1, may not have been considered in the tool’s design and are now explicitly accounted for.
The official release specifically mentions “Significantly improved robustness against Stable Diffusion 1, 2, SDXL, especially for smooth surface art (e.g. anime, cartoon)”. Therefore, we decided to test this new tool with the contemporary artist nulevoy, who draws in a cartoon style and gave us permission to display their artwork. As with the previous version, we only have access to the publicly available Windows application that uses unknown parameters. We protect the images using the “highest” protection option. Our main findings are:
-
Glaze v2.0 introduces more visible perturbations uniformly over the images. See Figure 20.
-
Glaze v2.0 does not improve protection under robust mimicry. Noisy Upscaling still achieves almost perfect style mimicry. See Figure 21.
-
Noisy Upscaling is able to to remove visible perturbations during preprocessing as before. See Figure 22.
Authors:
(1) Robert Honig, ETH Zurich (robert.hoenig@inf.ethz.ch);
(2) Javier Rando, ETH Zurich (javier.rando@inf.ethz.ch);
(3) Nicholas Carlini, Google DeepMind;
(4) Florian Tramer, ETH Zurich (florian.tramer@inf.ethz.ch).
This paper is