avatar
torts
torts's Blog
Torts
torts
torts's Blog
Torts
  • Read My Stories
About Torts
Login
  • About Torts
  • Login

Compute Resources for Style Mimicry Experiments

cover
15 Dec 2024

Table of Links

Abstract and 1. Introduction

  1. Background and Related Work

  2. Threat Model

  3. Robust Style Mimicry

  4. Experimental Setup

  5. Results

    6.1 Main Findings: All Protections are Easily Circumvented

    6.2 Analysis

  6. Discussion and Broader Impact, Acknowledgements, and References

A. Detailed Art Examples

B. Robust Mimicry Generations

C. Detailed Results

D. Differences with Glaze Finetuning

E. Findings on Glaze 2.0

F. Findings on Mist v2

G. Methods for Style Mimicry

H. Existing Style Mimicry Protections

I. Robust Mimicry Methods

J. Experimental Setup

K. User Study

L. Compute Resources

L Compute Resources

Table 4 reports the compute resources for our experiments.

Table 4: Compute resources for our experiments. Execution time per image / (artist) reports the execution time of the method to compute a single image, or the combined execution time for all samples of an artist, if the method operates on all samples of an artist at once. † Google Cloud ‡ IMPRESS++ requires an additional 2 seconds per image generation.

Authors:

(1) Robert Honig, ETH Zurich (robert.hoenig@inf.ethz.ch);

(2) Javier Rando, ETH Zurich (javier.rando@inf.ethz.ch);

(3) Nicholas Carlini, Google DeepMind;

(4) Florian Tramer, ETH Zurich (florian.tramer@inf.ethz.ch).


This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 license.


← Previous

How We Evaluated Different AI Techniques for Mimicking Artistic Styles

Up Next →

User Study for Evaluating Robust Style Mimicry

avatar
torts
torts's Blog
Torts
torts
torts's Blog
Torts
  • About
  • Stories
  • Random Story
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Publish Your Story